Home » Media » Stop the ‘gaslighting’?

Stop the ‘gaslighting’?

Some of the commenters at Steve Sailer’s blog are upset by the use of the term ‘gaslighting’. Somehow they seem to find it especially annoying and tiresome, so much so that comments like the following have appeared:

Whenever people become newly acquainted with a thinky new concept, the use of which they believe will show off their intellectual chops, they tend to over-apply it prodigiously. It’s been an unhappily acquired hobby of mine to track these ripples in thought-space, as a once obscure term starts showing up in one columnist’s repertoire after another with increasing frequency before fading off again

Well, I guess two, or any number, can play at this game. An example, in the paragraph above: the word ‘thinky‘. Is that even a word?  I had to turn to that great fount of erudition, The Urban Dictionary, to learn how it is used.  So  a word like ‘thinky’ is good, but ‘gaslighting’, which is a term that has been in use for some years, is not?

I confess I am one of those offenders who has used (recently, in fact) the term gaslighting. So that makes me one of the ‘intellectually vain‘? This man says so, so it  must be:

“Gaslighting” is a very useful concept to have once you get your head around it, but because of its inherently sophisticated subject, it is prone to being either misunderstood by the general population or overused by the intellectually vain. In this respect, I believe, it is similar to the hackneyed cliche or quotation.”

I probably will be tempted to use the term again, making me a repeat offender. I use it because it has a precise meaning, one that is not hard to understand, and it therefore serves a purpose — one for which I will probably employ it as I see fit.

Someone else on that thread said that the verb ‘to trick’ is a simpler and better way of expressing the idea behind gaslighting. Not so. ‘Trick’ is a much less precise term. Unfortunately the term ‘gaslighting’ was adopted some years ago by people in the psychology trade and they do often use it in the sense of ‘psychological abuse’ of women by men. I can’t help that they’ve taken the meaning of the term in another direction.

In the movie versions of ‘Gaslight’, the villain had a specific strategy of making his target think she was going insane, as he manipulated reality to produce false perceptions. As I recall, he also made others doubt the woman’s sanity as she was made to appear delusional, and as a result she began to lose her mental stability.

No need to make this a feminist issue: we, the normal members of the public, are manipulated by a devious and cunning system to doubt our own perceptions. We are being made to feel as though the problem is with us: we are paranoid. We are ‘conspiracy-mongers’, extremists, unhinged. We are ‘phobic’ in some way or another.  Even worse, our collective history is being manipulated and altered by the rewriting of history in which we are made out to be the cause of all evils and all problems. News stories disappear, like the stories of the post-Katrina Superdome events, or the 2000 ‘Election that wouldn’t die’, as the Democrats concocted tales of flawed ballots, leading up to months of drama over vote recounts, ‘hanging chads’, culminating in the Supreme Court decision that ended months of such insanity. And now the national media and the Left feign horror at the idea that Trump might ‘not accept the results of the election.” As if such a thing had never ever happened before — when they themselves refused to accept the 2000 election results. Or maybe we just imagined that happened. Yes, that must be it.

Of course the young millennials never heard of those events, and even if they were told of it they would likely scoff — because if it had really happened, why had they not been taught about it?

That’s gaslighting. One day those of us, as the survivors of that era who still remember those days, will be told outright that we imagined it; it’s all a senile delusion.

So can we sum up all those processes by using the word ‘trick’?  It’s just not an adequate word to the task. If people don’t understand the nuances of the term ‘gaslight’, perhaps because they never saw the movie which gave rise to the term, well, that’s no one’s fault but theirs.  Perhaps they don’t like old movies or ‘passé’ popular culture.

From my point of view, I often don’t get the meaning of various current pop culture references, which are used everywhere on the Internet. I expect the people who use pop culture references would dismiss me as out of touch for failing to grasp their allusions to Harry Potter or The Matrix or whatever the current pop culture fads are. But if I am, it’s by design. I don’t find much of any value to me in such trends du jour. Does that make me a ‘snob’? Everybody looks down on certain aspects of pop culture; to some, everything that’s recent has more cachet than old movies, so it is not surprising that an old movie reference is viewed as hackeneyed and cliched by most people. The thing is, every cliche and every so-called ‘hackneyed’ phrase was once new and fresh. Cliches are popularized because they seemed apt — and fresh, once.

If I could vote down certain terms I would say I am sick of the overuse of the verb ‘to pivot‘ — I’ve never seen it used so much in my life as in this current election season. Who knows why it has become so overused? People are copycats, for the most part, herd thinkers.




2 thoughts on “Stop the ‘gaslighting’?

  1. I agree with you on gaslighting VA. We are being gaslighted.

    One of the anti-gaslighters, who seem to be natsec types, suggests down the memory hole instead.

    But how does something go down the memory hole if it is not gaslighted? Isn’t gaslighting the mechanism and going down the memory hole an outcome of gaslighting, at least in this case?

    A specific natsec was derided on that thread and natsecs in general. Are they not gaslighters by profession? Guest could be the person mentioned.

    Another anti-gaslighter has a webpage link and a name there. Googling it and adding PhD to the name, one possibility is an asst prof with a 2014 PhD from Missouri U. This is the thinky person. He sounds like a classic recent Mizzou Ph.D. grad.

    The movie Gaslighting is based on the play Gaslighting whose author, Patrick Hamilton, also wrote Rope which is based on Leopold Loeb. Clarrence Darrow was the lawyer for Leopold and Loeb. If you believe there are hoax trials, that is a strong candidate. Darrow’s cases look suspicious now including Scopes Monkey Trial. Lawyers have been saying that case was not tried right for a long time.

    Vincent Price was in one play version of Gaslighting and is descended from Peregrine White. I think you mentioned you had Mayflower ancestry VA, so that may be of special interest to you.

    However, one sees these cases, the idea of gaslighting obviously existed in 1938 when the play was performed. I think we are waking up from gaslighting that has been going on for a very long time. Some would prefer that waking up be delayed until after they are beyond the possibility of trial or at least shame.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Thanks, OA, for the comments and the additional info as usual.
    I was not aware that there had been a ‘Gaslight’ play before the movie versions, nor obviously did I know that the same man wrote ‘Rope.’ I was aware that Rope was about the Leopold and Loeb case, though I never saw it because the subject matter was just too distressing to me. I also didn’t know that Darrow was the defense attorney for L & L. Interesting about the two trials, Scopes and the L & L trial, might be ‘hoax’ trials. I will have to look into that.

    Vincent Price is someone whose acting I admire, at least when he was not in the type of movie which involved him hamming it up. He was a good comic actor as well as dramatic. As for his ancestry, we may have some New England connection though I’m afraid I don’t have Mayflower ancestry; my New England ancestors were Johnny-come-latelies who arrived around 1630, on the New England side. 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s